If an organization is savvy, it will make this new tool a friend. Disregard it, it could become a foe.
There has been quite a bit of buzz this week surrounding YouTube Direct, a platform that narrows the gap between news organizations and anyone with video-capture capabilities. Thanks to digital cameras that shoot video, the economically priced Flip video camcorder and the fact that many cell phones can now shoot video, that means A LOT more people just became citizen journalists.
The new tool allows media organizations to request, review and rebroadcast YouTube clips directly from YouTube users.
If you work in or with your communications department or agency, then you may be familiar with the idea of pitching stories to, or having stories broken by bloggers. You may have also heard horror stories of disgruntled customers sounding off on blogs, Twitter or Facebook. You also hear great stories about customers promoting brands themselves through those same outlets. Imagine all of this in video, and figure in that these videos may have just gotten exponentially easier for news organizations that hit your key demographics and stakeholders to upload and share.
There is a lot of exciting opportunity that YouTube’s new tool presents. Only time will tell whether or not this really takes off and how much the media will really put it to use. I imagine it will take off, though, since everyday people like you and me can capture a video faster than a news crew can arrive on a scene, and because having video to accompany a story makes the content much more rich and the story much more authentic.
The Washington Post, ABC-News, NPR and the Huffington Post are among the media outlets that have already used YouTube Direct.
Consider what doors this development opens, as well as what you need to be careful of. If you do not do regular YouTube searches related to your brand, you could be missing out on something that just got a lot easier for a news organization to find… for better or for worse.
With all the hype today about Twitter, everyone who’s anyone is on it and actively using this new social media channel to its full capacity, right? Think again.
According to an AdAge article, 76% of Twitter accounts are infrequent users. I guess that shouldn’t really surprise me since it does take extra effort to make the most of this tool, but I just assumed that these big name companies have the resources and time to invest as well as the know-how to execute. I guessed wrong.
So, my point in all this is that it is not too late to start taking an active role in your company to increase the chance for success. As long as someone is held accountable for keeping up with it, there is a lot to be gained.
Whether you use Twitter as a newsfeed, brand-builder, sales channel, thought-leadership vehicle, or as a customer-service tool, just get started and keep the momentum going.
In closing, I would just like to say to all you slackers out there, get your assets in gear.
This is mostly for Government agencies and contractors, because I know many of you are still unsure. There is no way I could possibly cover everything you want or need to know in this one blog post, but I want to at least graze over a couple of points and perhaps this will expand out into a series so I may go more in-depth on particular points. For now, however, I want to make just a few quick points that I think are thought-provoking enough, even in their simplicity, to get your organization serious about social media engagement:
In 2008, pharmaceutical companies spent more than 50 billion dollars on drug promotions. Put a different way, that’s 50,000 Super Bowl commercials, or one enormous diamond-studded statue of the Cialis bathtub couple.
As it turns out, drug companies spend vastly more money on marketing than they do on research and development.
But to be fair, it takes a whole lot of ad dollars to sell brand-name drugs. After all, they’re legally identical to their “bioequivalent” counterparts.
So here’s what’s happening: after the initial drug patent has expired (20 years pre-clinical trials), drug companies have to spend billions to maintain their market share–which isn’t easy when Plavix costs five dollars per dose, and the Plavix biosimilar costs three cents.
But with a 50 billion dollar budget, the marketing works, and consumers (particularly American consumers since we’re one of, if not the only nation that doesn’t regulate drug prices) end up buying the brands they see on TV.
Only now, Senators Franken, Brown, and Whitehouse are proposing an end to the federal tax deduction for prescription drug marketing, as part of the current health care reform legislation.
Not surprisingly, the 4As and the AAF are up in arms, since this type of policy change could increase the cost of drug marketing by 35%.
Franken argues that tax payers shouldn’t have to subsidize pharmaceutical marketing campaigns while their own health care options remain cost-prohibitive.
I’ll be floored if this type of stipulation is ever approved in the Senate. But if it is, it’s bad news for a host of other ad agency cash cows that might lose their marketing tax deductions (fast food, alcohol, cigarettes).
Then again, if we started penalizing every business that’s detrimental to society, they’d have to close down Las Vegas.
It was the perfect brand storm. Just in time for Halloween, Walmart entered the lucrative world of online funeral casket sales, following in the footsteps of Costco. The move sent buzz metrics surging: millions of hits, site visits, tweets, and even positive product ratings. In short, everyone was talking about discount funeral caskets and the smiley-faced retail icon. Most importantly, Walmart’s social media monitoring tools showed the greatest spike in customer interest since the Snuggy first hit shelves.
But soon a macabre reality hit home. Most of the positive social media activity had come from the iPhone/generation Y-Not community, hardly the target buyers of caskets. Worse, a large degree of the positive social response was, in fact, vicious sarcasm (including fake product reviews poking fun at Walmart’s virtual funeral parlor), a concept that social media monitoring tools are woefully unable to detect.
What can we learn from this marketing case study?
Bottom line: As corporate marketers and their agencies oversee the strategic shift to digital media (with the promise of more accountability and measurability), they must always remember that no computer or offshore $2/hour data monitor will ever replace critical, expert analysis. Forget that, and we just might end up financing our own marketing caskets.
(Kudos to Craig Daitch’s column on www.Adage.com)


Hello, my name is Michael and I’m addicted to all things Google. Yes I am excited about the Droid since I am with Verizon, yes I do 99.9% of my searches on Google and yes I love most of Google’s apps (sidenote: check out Sketchup if you haven’t’ already).
I ran across an interesting list of Google facts today that I thought I would share. One of my favorites is definitely the image of the first “Google Machine” below, and yes, that is made with Legos. The second interesting fact is for all of you who every now and then use the “I’m Feeling Lucky” button. Did you realize that button costs Google around $110 million a year in lost revenue from redirecting visitors past the AdWords ads and straight to a website?
For those of infatuated with Google like I am, the list is a good afternoon read.
This week I attended a Photoshop conference in DC, put on by Mogo Media. It was phenomenal. In two days, I learned a wealth of information that I have already begun to put into practice. Keep in mind that I have been using Photoshop for years, and I am already highly skilled. It just goes to show you how quickly software is updated and how much Photoshop can do. I encourage everyone to keep learning, whether it is through online tutorials, webinars, blog posts, conferences, or any other form of communication.
Here are a few things I came away with:
I hope I have encouraged everyone keep learning and update your skills, even if it is in another program such as Word or Excel that you might be using on a daily basis. The additional confidence is invigorating.